GRIDDED

Comparison

A CADMapper alternative built for analysis, iteration and export, not only data extraction.

Architects usually do not need another source of raw map lines. They need a faster way to move from location to a clean, styled, decision-ready site analysis. Below is a practical way to compare Gridded and CADMapper on one real site: what to check, what to export and how much work is still left afterwards.

  • generate the study area once, then keep iterating without paying for every visual tweak
  • switch between 2D, 3D, sun study and export from the same project
  • save presets for different client, competition or internal review views
Functional analysis in 3D. One study area with buildings coloured by use. The style list on the left switches the same site between analysis presets.
Functional analysis in 3D. One study area with buildings coloured by use. The style list on the left switches the same site between analysis presets.

Why people compare them

Where CADMapper is useful and where the workflow usually starts to break

CADMapper is often used as a fast route to linework. The problem starts one step later: when the architect still needs to restyle the output, compare several views, check massing context, produce a sun study or build client-facing diagrams without rebuilding the same base again.

  • linework export is only the first half of the task
  • visual iteration usually continues outside the original tool
  • early-phase studies need context, not only extraction

What Gridded changes

Gridded treats the project as a reusable study area, not a one-off export

In Gridded the project starts with one fixed analysis area. From there the user can switch presets, edit visibility, add custom geometry, view the site in 3D, test sun and shadow and export different outputs without rebuilding the map. That makes it much closer to a real architecture workflow than a single extraction step.

  • one project = one fixed study area
  • multiple presets for the same site and the same source data
  • DXF, SVG, PDF and GeoJSON exports from the same project state
Preset-based iteration inside one project. Functional, building, transport and greenery analysis of the same study area, switched from the style list without generating the map again.
Preset-based iteration inside one project. Functional, building, transport and greenery analysis of the same study area, switched from the style list without generating the map again.

Workflow

How to evaluate Gridded as a CADMapper alternative in a real project

Use the same location in both tools. The point is not only to compare export fidelity, but to compare how much useful work still remains after the first output.

Step 1

Generate the site once and name the project by address or client code

Create one fixed-area project around the site. This is the base for every later export, screenshot and preset.

Fixed study area. The analysis area is set once, as a circle, a square or your own polygon, and every later style, view and export uses it.
Fixed study area. The analysis area is set once, as a circle, a square or your own polygon, and every later style, view and export uses it.
Step 2

Build at least three presets before exporting anything

Create one clean context preset, one transport or access preset and one presentation preset with a calmer background and fewer layers.

Style list and layers. Built-in analysis styles and your own saved styles sit in one list, with layer visibility for the current view below it.
Style list and layers. Built-in analysis styles and your own saved styles sit in one list, with layer visibility for the current view below it.
Step 3

Switch to 3D and capture one context view with sun or shadow

This is where the comparison usually becomes clear. The architect can verify massing context and sun direction without leaving the same project.

Sun analysis in 3D. Sun path and building shadows on the same study area at a chosen time of day.
Sun analysis in 3D. Sun path and building shadows on the same study area at a chosen time of day.
Step 4

Export the final preset, not raw data only

The final deliverable should already look close to what you need on a board, in CAD or in an internal review deck: a PDF sheet at scale, a PNG for the board, DXF for AutoCAD, ArchiCAD or Revit, or SVG for Illustrator and Figma.

What you get

What one project gives you

The comparison is not only about data. It is about how much finished material comes out of the same project without rebuilding it somewhere else.

  • diagram-ready context map for boards and early client decks
  • clean DXF or SVG base for CAD and Illustrator refinement
  • one saved preset for each visual direction: context, transport, greenery, sun study
  • 2D and 3D views of the same site, ready for the next design review

Comparison

CADMapper vs Gridded: workflow-oriented comparison

This comparison intentionally focuses on what architects still need after the first export, because that is where most time is really spent.

CriterionGriddedCADMapper
Primary jobGenerate, iterate, save presets and exportExtract map data for downstream work
Project modelOne reusable study area with multiple viewsOften treated as a one-off export task
3D + sun studyAvailable in the same project workflowUsually handled elsewhere
Preset logicBuilt around saved visual states for the same siteMostly external restyling after export
Best use caseArchitecture site analysis and diagram productionInitial linework acquisition

Frequently asked questions

Is Gridded trying to replace every CAD or GIS tool?

No. It is strongest in the gap between raw location data and a presentable, export-ready site analysis workflow for architects.

Which export formats does Gridded support?

PDF sheets from A4 to A1, fitted to the page or at a fixed scale from 1:500 to 1:5000, PNG up to 8K, DXF for AutoCAD, ArchiCAD and Revit, SVG for Illustrator and Figma, GeoJSON for QGIS or ArcGIS, and terrain as DXF contours, a LandXML surface or XYZ points.

Which locations does Gridded cover?

Poland and the rest of Europe: 50 countries and territories, from Portugal and Ireland to Finland and Greece. Everywhere you get buildings, building use, roads, rail, public transport, water and greenery from OpenStreetMap, the 3D view and the sun study. Polish sites also use official national data: cadastral parcels, terrain, zoning plans, flood and noise maps, and building heights from the national surface model. The app tells you straight away whether a picked area is covered.

Related pages